Fine-Tuning Scope for Project Success
The fate of most projects is determined long before the first task is assigned. It’s decided early on during conversations where scope is shaped. Getting scope right while drafting the Project Charter doesn’t just avoid problems later on; it builds the case for why the project deserves to exist. Check out these approaches to help you define scope in a way that maximizes success.
- Tie scope to the business problem or opportunity, not the proposed. Invest time in defining the problem or business opportunity. Clearly determine what’s broken, who is affected, and the cost of doing nothing. Scope that’s built from a well-defined problem is easier to justify to sponsors and stakeholders. And it’s typically easier to trim or adjust if needed without losing the project’s core benefits.
- Engage end users early to validate assumptions before scope is set. Scope defined entirely by sponsors and subject matter experts often contains blind spots. Evaluate these areas by involving people who do the day-to-day work. Bringing end users into early scoping conversations identifies constraints, workflow realities, and other needs that would otherwise emerge later, increasing cost and risk.
- Compare scope size with available capacity. Before the scope is finalized, test it against the team’s capacity to deliver the project. Assess competing priorities, skill gaps, and the ever-present demands of team members’ day jobs. If the scope cannot be delivered with the available resources within the defined timeframe, refine it early. Don’t make an unreasonable commitment with the intention of figuring things out when the time comes. A smaller, well-scoped project that succeeds is worth far more to an organization and to project management credibility than an ambitious one that causes day-to-day business issues.
- Use a phased scope to separate must-haves from desirables. Work with stakeholders to explicitly prioritize scope into categories. Three potential categories are: a) Minimum Viable Product (MVP) items – mandatory items for the project to achieve its core objective, b) important items that are useful if capacity allows, and c) nice-to-haves that can be deferred. This structure not only sharpens the business case by keeping the core investment focused but also gives you a principled way to manage scope if time or cost constraints tighten.
- Stress-test scope with your delivery team before sign-off. Before the scope is formally baselined, bring in the delivery team for a formal review. Look to identify requirements that are ambiguous, technically risky, or dependent on factors outside the team’s control. Try to identify areas of complexity and compare the risk of complexity against the potential business benefit. Delivery teams involved in scope definition are usually energized and feel greater ownership and clarity. And that clarity can mean faster project launches and fewer misaligned expectations.
Grab the scope from a current or past project and use these steps to evaluate the scope. If it’s a past project, would these approaches have helped avoid some of issues you experienced?
For more about project scope, check out my Project Management Foundations course.
_______________________________________
This article belongs to the Bonnie’s Project Pointers newsletter series, which has more than 104,000 subscribers. This newsletter is 100% written by a human (no aliens or AIs involved). If you like this article, you can subscribe to receive notifications when a new article posts.
Want to learn more about the topics I talk about in these newsletters? Watch my courses in the LinkedIn Learning Library and tune into my LinkedIn Office Hours live broadcasts.